It should have gone to a younger person, and preferably somebody who is not the living embodiment of pure, unadulterated evil.
emysemys said:If "they" didn't pull any strings and get him in front of someone else on the list, then I say, he should have it. Just because you don't like someone is no reason to deny him his heart.
But I need my body parts.Jacqui said:Wow! I have to say I am a bit shocked at the feelings coming out on this one. As long as no strings are pulled, then I really don't have a problem with him getting it. I have more of a problem with all the good possible body parts NOT being used to either save or improve the quality of somebody's life.
dmmj said:But I need my body parts.Jacqui said:Wow! I have to say I am a bit shocked at the feelings coming out on this one. As long as no strings are pulled, then I really don't have a problem with him getting it. I have more of a problem with all the good possible body parts NOT being used to either save or improve the quality of somebody's life.
Jacqui said:dmmj said:But I need my body parts.Jacqui said:Wow! I have to say I am a bit shocked at the feelings coming out on this one. As long as no strings are pulled, then I really don't have a problem with him getting it. I have more of a problem with all the good possible body parts NOT being used to either save or improve the quality of somebody's life.
Sorry David, I must have missed the thread announcing your death.
sharkstar said:he waited, he got the heart. end of story.........
personally I would have rather it gone to someone that actually has a life-span and something to give (meaning a younger person) receive the heart.
terryo said:So, only young, Liberals should get a heart? Wow!! Very scary.
Good news is, it looks like it is gonna be voted down.TylerStewart said:terryo said:So, only young, Liberals should get a heart? Wow!! Very scary.
LOL, yeah, I think that's part of the new health care law, buried somewhere in the 2,600 pages.