Neuroscientist studying his dog's brain

Status
Not open for further replies.

thatrebecca

Active Member
5 Year Member
Joined
Apr 24, 2013
Messages
928
Location (City and/or State)
Los Angeles, CA
Thought all the animal lovers on here would be interested in this NY Times article by a neuroscientist who trained his dog and others to get MRIs, and learned some fascinating things about how dogs' brains work.

Here's a quote from the story and a link to it:

"The ability to experience positive emotions, like love and attachment, would mean that dogs have a level of sentience comparable to that of a human child. And this ability suggests a rethinking of how we treat dogs."

http://www.nytimes.com/2013/10/06/opinion/sunday/dogs-are-people-too.html?smid=pl-share
 

reatrocity

Member
5 Year Member
Joined
Sep 6, 2013
Messages
139
Location (City and/or State)
West Virginia, United States
Really interesting! :) Thanks for sharing. I think many other animals are the same way, even if we can't necessarily prove it, which is why I refuse to eat animal products. It's the circle of life and to each their own, but I can't do it in good conscious, especially since we use animals in so many other ways. I hope eventually people start taking the welfare of animals more seriously and see them and respect them as equals. Only then will we more closely look at the damage we're causing to our world. Unfortunately I feel this is completely idealistic, and if it ever happens, it definitely won't happen in my lifetime.
 

ascott

Well-Known Member
10 Year Member!
Joined
Apr 10, 2011
Messages
16,131
Location (City and/or State)
Apple Valley, California
Wow, scientists/doctors will stop at nothing will they.

I did not need a doctor/scientist/radiation riddled test to tell me animals respond to positive behavior ....I have always known they enjoy pleasure--as do most living things...but again, they can only guess this is the case, this is a group of folks that are trying to gain access to allowing people to be cited for treatment of animals --I thought we already had this--Animal Control, I thought people were already able to be cited and arrested for animal cruelty? I don't see what the big difference/deal is here?

I bet alot of money was used during this "experiment" also, what is the eventual outcome for this dozen of test subjects?
 

Millerlite

Well-Known Member
10 Year Member!
Joined
Nov 20, 2008
Messages
2,669
Location (City and/or State)
Southern Calif.
A lot of us knew this already, just because we own dogs and as humans we have had dogs for thousands of years as mans best friend. However science needs to do experimental work in order to prove that this is the case. Then they can have real evidence of the way the brain works, instead of just guessing or making up theories. I like science articles from the simple experiments all the way to adding matter to light or DNA sequence or anything else that's just cool


Check out my site and channel:
Www.tortoise-spot.webs.com
Www.youtube.com/tortoisespot


Oh and scientist won't stop till there are no more questions to be answered



Check out my site and channel:
Www.tortoise-spot.webs.com
Www.youtube.com/tortoisespot
 

Jabuticaba

Well-Known Member
5 Year Member
Joined
Jul 12, 2013
Messages
1,744
Location (City and/or State)
Winnipeg, MB
As a dog lover and avid dog behaviour enthusiast, I'm excited about some other findings that will come out of such studies. But, why must we reclassify dogs as "people," at all? I mean, they are better than some people I know and do we really need to prove that they have emotions--we already know it!--in order to better relate to them?

Can we fund research on how to eliminate jerks and animal abusers? Just my .02 cents.


May[TURTLE]
1.1.0 Hermannis: Darwin & Wallace
Aussies: Dax, Vegas, & Cricket
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

New Posts

Top