I think what is implied by one here on the forum is that the cold tollerance is genetically based and not size based.
If I compare 2 rocks of the same material, but different sizes and heat them up to the same temp, it could be stated that the smaller one would cool faster and that has nothing to do with "gigathermy"
If I compare 2 rocks of the same material, but different sizes and heat them up to the same temp, it could be stated that the smaller one would cool faster and that has nothing to do with "gigathermy"
Balboa said:Well no it doesn't prove didly squat
but, it does stand to reason that a larger tortoise WILL be more cold tolerant than a smaller one. SOOOO if a 20 year old Gpp can be expected to be larger than a 20 year old Gpb AND its "smart" enough to to keep moving in order to generate some heat and keep foraging rather than just lay in a cold spot I'd consider it more cold tolerant.
onarock said:I think it implies that cold tollerance between the 2 subs only applies to adults. So, if I'm reading you post correctly your stating that they have the same cold tollerance untill gpp reach 40lbs and then somehow become even more cold tollerant? This still does'nt prove that gpp are more cold tollerant.
Balboa said:Biologically, to the best of my knowledge, cold blooded animals are cold blooded animals, there aren't major internal differences on the cellular level between species that will allow for a major difference in temperature tolerance. There can be some anatomical differences that count though, such as blubber and size. I forget the exact term, but larger tortoise can employ something like "gigathermy" wherein they can maintain a higher core temp than ambient via activity and heat inertia. This implies that a larger pardalis will in fact be more "cold tolerant" than a typically smaller babcocki.