Of all the things we agree on, we will not agree on this because I've seen it with my own eyes. You haven't. Yet. I get it. I can't un-see what I've seen because you or Jaizei haven't come across one of the bad bulbs yet.I completely agree with @jaizei I also feel this is one thing that keeps many very serious, scientific-based keepers from using this forum.
The research has certainly been done. Read through the forum Reptile Lighting. Several of the contributors there do have the extremely expensive spectrometers and equipment to thoroughly test bulbs and do so regularly. They were actually the first to really call manufacturers on the problems with CFL and other faulty bulbs (it was not limited to CFLs) and push to get changes. Extensive testing has been done and is done constantly and no one has produced a faulty CFL bulb from a brand manufacturer in over 10 years. Not one.
I have watched this forum for over 7 years now for a post on eye damage from a CFL and have not found one that turned out to be shown to be the CFL. I see many that immediately assume that as soon as CFL is mentioned. Far more eye damage posts were due to MVBs and even tubes that were placed wrong. With UVB use, it is too easy to mount any bulb too close, especially CFLs that appear dimmer and cooler, and then jump to the conclusion that there is a problem with the bulb if it is a CFL, yet not come to the same conclusion if it is a tube!
How many issues have been missed because as soon as anyone mentions a CFL immediatley there is an outpouring of how bad they are and no further looking into what the real problem may be is done! Yet this forum continues to simply parrot the CFLs are simply bad mantra.