To tell anyone that UVB is not necessary, and not include a disclaimer, I think is damaging. There is no proof that its healthy. So why would anyone advocate following a care regiment that lacks UVB?
If someone wants to say its not necessary, lets hear some research and information that backs that claim up.
My support for torts needing it are the studies done by exo terra and mega ray respectively, about the content of UVB and non UVB lighting.
If someone wants to say its not necessary, lets hear some research and information that backs that claim up.
My support for torts needing it are the studies done by exo terra and mega ray respectively, about the content of UVB and non UVB lighting.