Alaskamike
Well-Known Member
This "experiment" has limited value. We can learn nothing about the positive effects of coconut oil from this. Yes, your tortoises look good. But that may be due to your husbandry practices aside from the oil. The oil may be doing nothing at all.
You can cite facts about the properties of coconut oil all day, and even if all those facts suggest that oil should have a positive effect on tortoise shells, it is meaningless until it is demonstrated. There are too many variables and unknowns in tortoise care to link the keratin and uv light factoids posted in this thread to the health of the shells of your tortoises.
If you keep this up for another 19 years with similar results, we may be able to state that coconut oil will not harm tortoises. But that is very different from the claims you are attempting to make in this thread.
Given that you have 2 tortoises, it really seems like a wasted opportunity that you did not choose to oil one and not the other, to observe the differences in shell growth. That would have demonstrated something, albeit to a limited degree. Until 2 hatchlings from the same clutch are raised in the same conditions, with the only difference in husbandry practices being one shell is oiled and the other is not, we will have no reliable understanding on the effects of coconut oil on shell growth.
I think you make some valid points.
- It is not an experiment in scientific terms without strict protocol, an unbiased expectation, and a control group – preferably with a decent n. - dozens probably.
- It can take years to see results of shell growth and overall health of tortoises
- No amount of antidotal information can substitute for facts that be substantiated in a controlled experiment
But having conceded this, there are some things I think we can learn from the researched properties of coconut oil, as well as an understanding of how tortoise shells form and grow. I know I have learned allot from the exchanges here, and it prompted me to really study what is known of shell formation and the underlying biology of the tortoise.
There is also substantiated science behind the way artificial lights work, heat & infrared, and the wavelengths present. It is worth knowing and looking intently at this.
I agree that to make this a scientific study – even a basic amateur one – you would need to have a control group and a treatment group. Raise them as much as possible in the same environment, same food sources, light, etc., and then document their progress carefully. If I remember correctly this has been brought up and addressed as a flaw several times in this thread. The OP readily admits this is not what he is doing. Sometimes his enthusiasm for EVCO has brought criticism. At least he is trying something and I think it shows promise.
This whole thing reminds me a little bit of the high humid argument and husbandry practices that evolved in the hobby over the last 10 years or so. Even today with multiple successes there are still many who refute the idea, say it is unnatural, and claim it has both no scientific backing, or logical foundation. They still argue it is strictly a food, exercise, lack of sunlight issue. They point out it is antidotal, although the volume of babies raised this way who show no signs of pyramiding is growing steadily. Some say that the long term effects of a high humid environment may actually be causing internal damage to the tortoise we will not see for years.
I am not aware of anyone who has raised babies side by side, with all other things being as equal as possible, other that frequent soaks and high humidity long enough to demonstrate that the control group pyramids, and the ones in the high humid environment did not. If that study is out there I’d love to see it.
The information and growing evidence that good hydration and high humidity combine to keep shell growth smooth has come entirely from antidotal information and results over time from an initial hypothesis. It has come from breeders and hobbyists who despite their best care practices with food and environment were still seeing their tortoises pyramid. So they tried something else. And seeing progress and improvement continued and refined the practice. It is, as you noted, a long drawn out process. Not ideal, and not very ‘scientific’. And very antidotal. But still, it convinced me.
Regardless, progress is sometimes made this way. We hobbyists are not research scientists, but we do allot of amateur research into all the environmental components that can contribute to our pets health and well being. Sometimes we get it wrong, sometimes we get it right, and sometimes we stumble onto something that really makes a difference.

